I utilize it fairly thoroughly in looking loads since I’m happy with minute of deer (typically a lot better with three shot teams @ about an inch) accuracy furthermore highest velocity.
Please also bear in mind that a bolt-motion rifle with a longer barrel will probably achieve higher muzzle velocity than will a gasoline-operated short barrel.
Add to quote Only display this user #thirteen · Dec 23, 2012 Without a doubt Fred, as usually I recognize your enter. I have it narrowed right down to a nosler 52 gr personalized Opposition hpbt or even a fifty gr zmax bt. I will be working with them within an ar-fifteen rifle primarily. I'm not selected a powder and won't know till I begin producing exam loads as said in numerous posts. I just picked up some H335 to Check out and I believe I have A few other spherical foundation powders that i will attempt to run from the dillon powder measure likewise for check loads.
HYBRID 100V™ - This powder is the results of combining the technologies of spherical powders and extruded propellants. The chemistry of the spherical powder is coupled with the geometry of the extruded propellant, making a sleek-metering, super-shorter granule extruded formed propellant with significant Electricity.
Insert to estimate Only show this person #17 · Nov 25, 2014 Remember to don't just take this the wrong way but, you happen to be very seriously around considering this In case you are loading for an AR. Now if you're loading to get a bolt action or solitary shot, you might be imagining together the ideal strains.
I do have a little bit of practical experience with CFE 223. I've a Hornady electronic powder measure/scale I take advantage of for your tricky powders (like IMR4198 - my most loved .223 powder for tiny groups) that just will never throw regular prices via a powder measure. I purchased a 1 lb. bottle of CFE223 to try with fifty five grain bullets. I applied that Digital measure/scale Which powder drove that Digital unit wild. Wild? For many motive that powder saved providing me overweight expenses.
Rebs, your did not determine what grain bullet you will be dealing with. I have discovered H335 to be an Remarkable powder for 55gr bullets, but dismal for heavier bullets like SMK 69/77gr bullets.
As a result of similarities amongst website the .308 as well as the 7.62x51mm cartridges, There have been some confusion regarding primer choice. One example is, the 7.62x51 is loaded with a significant rifle magnum primer, including the CCI No. 34. Some of the reasoning for using this comparatively hot primer involves trustworthy ignition with spherical powders under all temperature extremes.
This is often an more mature thread, you might not get a reaction, and will be reviving an outdated thread. Be sure to take into consideration developing a new thread.
Your reloads may well slot in the Howa action, but you might have too much shoulder clearance which may decrease the precision as well as may perhaps result in split conditions around the circumference of the situation.
By choosing keep on you validate you have read our data protection data and recognized our general terms and conditions.
Posts: 3,881 I have the data in my reloading guide, I was just asking if any person experienced compared equally powders. Like I explained I cannot manage to get H335 to shoot as exact and CFE223. rebs
I loaded 55 grain Winchester comfortable stage bullets, utilised standard CCI modest rifle primers and Winchester conditions for that test. I worked up loads to what I thought were max for my rifle which was 25 grains of H322 and 26 grains of H335. These loads are really heat but not as superior as a number of my reloading manuals record. What I discovered is usually that when H335 can be Among the most used powders to the .
The post points out by illustration the mistake of employing load data for a single producer’s bullet on another’s bullet of different construction but a similar bodyweight. As an aside, a recognised (never to me!) difficulty with H335 is exposed.